As you may be aware, the Government has announced its intention to call an inquiry into the events that led to people being infected with HIV and/or hepatitis C through NHS-supplied blood or products.

The Government's decision is in recognition of the concern, expressed by many, that the previous inquiries and release of documents about this tragedy do not go far enough to provide the answers that those affected want and to get the truth of what happened.  In light of these concerns, and of reports of new evidence, the Government thinks it is important to understand the extent of what is claimed and the wider issues that arise.

Ministers are aware that there have been various suggestions made about the style and scope of an inquiry.  Some have called for an inquiry based on the model that was used to investigate the Hillsborough tragedy.  A so-called Hillsborough style panel would allow for a sensitive investigation of the issues, allowing those affected and their families close, personal engagement with an independent and trusted panel.

However, others have suggested that only a formal, statutory inquiry, led by a senior judge, under the Inquiries Act 2005 would provide the answers that those affected want.  Such an inquiry would have the power to compel witnesses to give oral and evidence, unlike a Hillsborough style panel.

The Government are aware that there are merits in both approaches and so wish to engage with those affected before taking a final decision, to ensure that whatever is established is in the interests of those affected.  This will also help us to understand preferences for the style, scope and duration of the inquiry.  Regardless of the style, the inquiry will cover the whole of the UK, given that this tragedy pre-dates devolution.